{"id":1754,"date":"2012-06-15T14:07:26","date_gmt":"2012-06-15T18:07:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.smartsign.com\/blog\/?p=1754"},"modified":"2025-02-28T04:17:39","modified_gmt":"2025-02-28T09:17:39","slug":"friday-five-sign-rage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.smartsign.com/blog\/friday-five-sign-rage\/","title":{"rendered":"Friday Five – Sign Rage"},"content":{"rendered":"

Signs like these are compliant with OSHA regulations, some of which were violated by New Jersey building company DD Stucco and Renovation.\u00a0(via MySafetySign.com<\/a>)<\/em><\/p>\n

June 15, 2012 —\u00a0OSHA\u00a0fines Clifton builder for safety violations The US Department of Labor\u2019s Occupation Safety and Health Administration, more commonly known as OSHA, recently fined a New Jersey construction company over\u00a0$100,000 for exposing workers to fall hazards at a worksite. Two of the six violations at\u00a0DD Stucco and Renovation LLC\u00a0were deemed willful violations, meaning that they showed . These two violations accounted for around $93,000\u00a0of the $108,240 of fines. The other four violations were serious violations, meaning that they carried a strong risk of death or serious harm, and accounted for the rest of the fines. According to OSHA, in 2007, falls caused at least 442 construction worker\u00a0fatalities.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Haniyyah Barnes and Honey Bey, the dog she killed over a driveway.<\/em><\/p>\n

Parking dispute prompts Newark woman to throw dog into oncoming traffic, cops say<\/a>\u00a0Many fights are confined to parking lots, a number of which have been\u00a0immortalized on the Internet<\/a>, but a Newark woman has allegedly taken street violence to a unique, new level. Haniyyah Barnes, 25, was recently indicted on charges of animal cruelty, burglary, criminal mischief, and theft after allegedly throwing a neighbor\u2019s Shih Tzu into oncoming traffic nearly a year ago. Authorities say that the woman, infuriated by a parked car blocking her driveway, kicked down her neighbor\u2019s front door. After threatening and assaulting the neighbor, police say that the woman took the dog and threw it into the street, killing it instantly. If convicted, she faces up to ten years in prison.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Alert citizens to state laws regarding alcohol consumption with proper signage. (via\u00a0CampgroundSigns.com<\/a>)\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Debate over alcohol sales in western Kentucky leads to thefts, vandalism, harsh words\u00a0A community debate in Benton, Kentucky, takes its fight to signs.\u00a0 Community disputes like this one\u00a0often<\/a>\u00a0erupt in chaos, especially when there are signs involved, but this time both sides are guilty of vandalizing the opposition\u2019s advertising and signage. \u00a0The debate is about legalizing alcohol, but it has exploded to where local police are now actively looking for anyone tampering with or stealing signs, a\u00a0possible felony<\/a>\u00a0in itself.<\/p>\n

\"Custom<\/p>\n

The SmartSign staff makes its own stop signs, at\u00a0MyCustomSign.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Youth\u00a0draws police lecture for placing fake stop sign in road.<\/a>\u00a0Fake signs\u00a0continue<\/a>\u00a0with a stop sign in Medina, Ohio. \u00a0After police arrived at the thoroughfare, the boy confessed to his wrongdoing, though the\u00a0sign had disappeared. One particularly incensed motorist heeded the\u00a0sign\u2019s advice, but then proceeded to put the sign in his car and drive\u00a0away, cursing at the boy as he did so. No one was hurt by the stunt,\u00a0probably because the road is only three blocks long and located in a residential area of the Ohio town.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Signs attached to stationary posts are acceptable, but the yellow outdoor parking signs will be prohibited according to the sign ban.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

City seeks sign ban ruling<\/a> Muskogee, OK, continues a six-year fight on the issue of portable signs. The government has prohibited any signs that are not permanently fixed, following a tourism expert and U.S. Sign Council member\u2019s comments that portable signs detracted from the county\u2019s appearance. Angered by the original ban, two sign company owners challenged the ban,<\/ins> and a second ordinance delayed enforcement. Unfortunately, the delay ended in 2011 and the argument has continued, with both sides seeking a final judgment on the issue.<\/p>\n

While some business owners have decided to adhere to the guidelines outlined in the ban, others are outraged by the premise. Commenters cite both corporate-owned billboards and campaign posters as far more offensive blights on the landscape. The municipality has responded by saying the delayed enforcement was sufficient to address complaints, and that it will push forward with the ban.<\/p>\n

– K. Howitt, T. Caruso, and N. Gilliat<\/p>\n

\n

Like this topic? Check out our related products:<\/h3>\n